Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quasi-Christian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. NawlinWiki 20:49, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Quasi-Christian

I'd normally have just speedied this, but it was already a disputed prod. It's just a Dictionary def, possibly neologism, and tells us nothing we don't already know from the prefix and the word "Christian". Seems to be little hope of becoming an encyclopedia article, see talk. Friday (talk) 00:04, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

• Transwiki this to Wiktionary if they will have it. As it stands it is a dicdef, and I cannot imagine this article ever being anything but. --- Deville (Talk) 02:21, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

  Admittedly I'm not up on what wiktionary likes, but it doesn't seem like a good dictionary entry to me. You can put "quasi" in front of many many words, and surely the resultant words do not usually need their own dictionary entry. I'm thinking this is a quasi-word, but I bet the word "quasi-word" isn't in wikitionary either. Friday (talk) 14:19, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. It is clearly a compound word, so I don't think Wiktionary would want it. There is no evidence of secondary sources discussing the word, as required by WP:NEO to have an article on neologisms. We see only sources using the word. GRBerry 02:29, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a collection of neologisms. Cedars 10:39, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, not sure it even worth adding to Wiktionary. Mallanox 18:58, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.