Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantic space-time

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was convert to anti-matter. —freak(talk) 23:40, Aug. 1, 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Quantic_space-time

Vague garbled miss-mash; zero google hits William M. Connolley 20:27, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete as original research. The main contributor to this page is User:Alvatros, who has also been the main contributor of such other similar articles as Time Dimensions, Time ages, and Luis Sancho (possible autobigraphy? or at least a big fan?) Fabricationary 20:42, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Yep, the same user who just posted to User_talk:JoanneB: "i imagine you have an all american, all physics background and a kin pleasure in censoring other cultures/sciences from your anglopocentirc pov." Crabapplecove 22:03, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Oh dear. In a blatant abuse of priviledge, and because I couldn't be bothered to list them for AFD, I speedied those two. Errrm... I'll restore them if this survives AFD William M. Connolley 21:43, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. This appears to be an incoherent restatement of things that are already at quantum gravity and spacetime, without references. --Christopher Thomas 21:01, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. It's not patent nonsense, but it's close. Crabapplecove 22:03, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete (speedily wouldn't be blatant abuse). --Pjacobi 22:28, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as unreferenced and likely non-notable philosophy. Delete, but I wouldn't speedy it. -MrFizyx 23:24, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.