Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qual theory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted as a re-creation of the previously deleted Qual.

[edit] Qual theory

This article appears to me to be at best unverifiable original reseatch, and possibly a hoax. For example:

• The theory's supposed creator Thomas H. Kedznie (or "Thomas H. Kendzie": spellings in different versions differ) gets zero Google hits,
• nor are there any Google hits for its supposed most dedicated opponent Arrhenius Fishner.
• I cannot find any Google hits for "Qual theory" in the sense meant in this article.
• There are no Google hits for the either of the journals cited, the "International Journal of Unified Physics" or "Quantum Chromodynamics Quarterly".

Contributed by User:Bytesizebrain, as their sole edit. Edited by User:WrAth2110, whose five edits so far include one edit to this, two to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qual, and one piece of vandalism to Fatah and its self-reversion. Ŧhis article is also the sole subject of attention of IP editor 71.201.92.252, which resolves to c-71-201-92-252.hsd1.il.comcast.net. -- Arthur Frayn 17:33, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Appears to be a recreation under another name of the previously AfD' Qual article, previously created by User:WrAth2110 and User:Bytesizebrain. Speedy deleting. -- The Anome 17:56, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.