Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quahog (Family Guy)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Family Guy. Edit history preserved for use in a potential merge of information. Shereth 19:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Quahog (Family Guy)

Quahog (Family Guy) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Non-notable fictional subject (per WP:WAF); Consists almost entirely of trivia. References are to the show itself, no secondary sources other than maps that really do not have to do with the fictional city; subject lacks sufficient secondary sources to improve to standards. NewYork483 (talk) 21:15, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

• Redirect to Family Guy. Almost all of the information is trivia and/or original research. Unsourced. Add a small "Setting" section to explain Quahog in the Family Guy page Frank Anchor ^{Talk to me} (R-OH) 21:21, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
• Redirect, per above. No notability is established. -LtNOWIS (talk) 21:36, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
• Keep It's as much a page full of trivia as Springfield (The Simpsons) is, and as notable as it. There is a lot of context there that once referenced would be perfectly useful and acceptable. I think deleting it at this point without any attempt at finding those references would be premature, at best. --Schcambo^{aon scéal?} 11:32, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

  See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, we're not talking about Springfield. I may change my vote if references are put in the page, but I couldn't find any good references on a google search. Frank Anchor ^{Talk to me} (R-OH) 14:30, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

• Redirect to Family Guy. Fails WP:FICT which states "Elements of a work of fiction, including individual stories, episodes, characters, settings, and other topics, are presumed to be notable if there is significant coverage of the element(s) in reliable secondary sources." There are almost no reliable sources in the article. The alticle is also loaded with trivia. Ben1283 (talk) 16:52, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Plot summaries tied together with original research. This is maybe worth a sentence in Family Guy, but not as a stand-alone article. --Phirazo 05:17, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
• Keep and trim mass OR. Merge into Family Guy. I've found a few sources and honestly I think this sort of thing is the reason people look up "Family Guy" on wikipedia. When you've got stuff like Springfield Elementary School and Steve Brady, I can't really see this as egregious. It's not up for a FA nomination or anything.--Loodog (talk) 06:55, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Again, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. The merits of Springfield Elemetery Schooland Steve Brady are not up for discussion. We're talking about Quahog here. Frank Anchor ^{Talk to me} (R-OH) 14:31, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Neither does WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS demand that every article with similar counterpart articles be deleted or that consistency should be completely ignored.--Loodog (talk) 16:16, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Amendment. I would support a merge of this into Family Guy because

1. This article doesn't have enough good content to warrant an article.
2. The Family Guy is short enough to take it.

--Loodog (talk) 16:57, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.