Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qotpp

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 03:44, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Qotpp

This term is a neologism. It should be deleted. Edward 13:10, 2005 May 29 (UTC)

• I concur. Almost nonsense, definitely nonsensical. Delete. Mr Bound 13:37, May 29, 2005 (UTC)
• I infer that there was a change in management at 24.83.225.248's place of employment back in January. Uncle G 14:08, 2005 May 29 (UTC)
• Delete as nonsense. — JIP | Talk 14:22, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• D concur nonsensical neologism. Fawcett5 20:37, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Mostly harmless joke, so move to BJAODN; if not, userfy if at all possible; otherwise delete. -- BD2412 ^talk 20:50, 2005 May 29 (UTC)
• BJAODN. — Phil Welch 23:55, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy deleteable. Denni☯ 01:31, 2005 May 30 (UTC)
• BJAODN. JamesBurns 07:45, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.