Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Q1 productions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. CitiCat ^♫ 03:56, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Q1 productions

Q1 productions (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Prod tag was removed by article's creator with no explanation. I nominated this article for prod because none of the references in the article at the time discussed this company at all. More ELs have been added since, but they're either directories of companies in their business class or agendas of presentations they put on – for example, "X will have a discussion hosted by Q Productions..." and that's it. Some of them list Q1 with a 'more info' URL, and that URL is dead.

I can't find any reviews of their work or articles about them or their personnel. Google isn't much help ; there are some recruitment listings and more of the 'presented by Q1 Productions" pages. I don't think sites with only a brief "presented by Q1" count toward notability, and this group fails WP:CORP. KrakatoaKatie 01:36, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete I can't find any verifiable, secondary sources providing information regarding notability. --BlindEagle^{talk~contribs} 17:04, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and BlindEagle, as not passing WP:CORP. Bearian 00:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.