Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pygophilia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-12-31 07:38Z

[edit] Pygophilia

Pygophilia (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Article consists of six words. No sources, no edits to article content since March. Article has been nominated for speedy delete before. Robotman1974 23:09, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, dicdef. Demiurge 23:16, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Demiurge. Danny Lilithborne 23:25, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Demiurge. –The Great Llama^{sign here} 23:29, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete already transwikied dicdef ~ Joe Jklin (T C) 23:33, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Strong delete -- already transwikied. Robert A.West (Talk) 23:52, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Comment I don't think this article meets speedy delete criteria. The article has to go through an AFD where the outcome is transwiki to meet CSD:A5. A technicality but still the rules. ~ Joe Jklin (T C) 17:48, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Point taken. Robert A.West (Talk) 20:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

• Anamislogiaphilia - arousal from the deletion of bad articles. (Stringing bits of Greek together does not an encyclopedia topic make.) Serpent's Choice 05:31, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:DICDEF. —ShadowHalo 23:09, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Metamagician3000 00:53, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.