Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PyTalker

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 21:24, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] PyTalker

Non-notable. 0 Google hits. Eric119 02:32, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, ad, link platform, could be speedied. Wyss 11:30, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - drivel --Brookie 12:28, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Don't Delete - the talker base was created on the 12th February, so it's easy to understand why doesn't Google still lists it. (comment by anon [User:193.136.236.65])

Even if it had some Google hits, it wouldn't be notable - having 0 Google hits is an extreme case of that. The point is that this is a piece of software that very few people have heard of, so it is extremely unlikely that someone is going to be looking for an encyclopedia article about it.

Basically, Wikipedia is not a place for you to promote your own software. There are other sites for that - a much more appropriate place, for example, is the Python Packages Index.

You are, of course, welcome to contribute things to Wikipedia. A good way to contribute is to find a topic that you know about, that other people would want to learn more about, and that isn't covered fully enough, and write or expand an article about it. When I joined Wikipedia, for example, I didn't write an article about the Python parser for parsing expression grammars that I was coding at the time, but I did write an article on parsing expression grammars. RSpeer 17:47, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.