Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pussyman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. ChetblongT C 01:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pussyman

Pussyman (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Was proded for "unreferenced, no references to be found online." User:Discharging P removed it because (see Talk:Pussyman) "I saw this prod on here, and after reading about how it works, I decided to remove it. I personally know of Pussyman and he is notable, IMO." Still unreferenced and I can't find references online. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:46, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete no assertion of notability that is sourced. JuJube (talk) 08:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete fails WP:N. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 10:23, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - per nom. --Komrade Kiev (talk) 13:37, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak keep and move to David Christopher. A quick search (seriously, the things I do for Wikipedia) took me to his home page (NSFW, of course), where I learned his real name. Following up with a more detailed search revealed some 82,000+ hits. While I am well aware of the shortcomings found in search engine tests, that tells me that it shouldn't be too hard to dig up something more substantial, and so I'm inclined to give the article a chance under the proper name and see what comes up. --jonny-mt 15:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete fails WP:N BalazsH (talk) 16:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Oh, bother. RFerreira (talk) 22:24, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong KEEP but would not oppose move to David Christopher. This guy is certainly notable.Discharging P (talk) 01:01, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete As the article stands, it fails WP:N and it is borderline nonsense. Alexf42 03:48, 24 February 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.