Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pussycat Dolls Second Studio Album

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:01, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pussycat Dolls Second Studio Album

Pussycat Dolls Second Studio Album (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Future album with no reliable sources. Too crystal-bally at this stage. Spellcast (talk) 07:04, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. A title, at least, would be nice. —97198 talk 07:33, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
• No prejudice against recreation. If someone wishes to create this in future with more sources out, please go ahead, despite this AfD resulting in (presumably) a delete result. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 08:26, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. But echoing what DHMO said above. PeterSymonds | talk 09:37, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:CRYSTAL.  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 10:40, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

• Not again! This article has already been deleted innumerable times under a variety of different names, see [1], [2], [3], [4]. Can we not wait until there is actually something to write an article about? PC78 (talk) 13:01, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:CRYSTAL —Preceding unsigned comment added by Team Sockpuppet USA (talk • contribs) 16:25, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.