Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pussy Wagon
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - redirected - SimonP 17:38, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Pussy Wagon
This orphan article is trivia from the movie Kill Bill. As far as I can tell, it is not in any way crucial to the plot or I would have been bold and merged it. I don't see any way to expand this into a real encyclopedia article. Rossami (talk) 05:44, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. This vehicle is in no way integral to the plot; it's really just a sight gag. See also Sheepdog van. android↔talk 06:13, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. The useful stuff is already mentioned in Kill Bill. -- Brhaspati (talkcontribs) 07:27, 2005 Mar 20 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect, there's already a mention in Kill Bill, and other than that it's not notable. --SPUI (talk) 11:29, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Merge anything useful into Kill Bill and redirect. Mgm|(talk) 12:24, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as per android's reason. Binadot 16:26, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Too minor to merge, and most of the article is awful anyway. -R. fiend 16:29, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Agree with the majority that it was just a small joke in the beginning of the movie to have an article on it. --Anonymous Cow 17:45, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect. Cburnett 18:03, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to discourage recreation - David Gerard 19:33, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to Kill Bill. --Viriditas | Talk 09:06, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- As of late, the general consensus would suggest that this should be merged and redirected to Kill Bill. Such is my vote. --GRider\talk 17:11, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Actually, yours is only the second vote for merge and redirect. Several others have said "redirect" but not "merge", while Mgm voted to merge "anything useful" (which is debatable, but certainly not the majority of the article could be called so). Most of the votes have been delete. -R. fiend 20:30, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Yes this is true. In general, I was referring to the overall consensus as of late pertaining to minor details that belong to larger, notable parent articles. --GRider\talk 21:04, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- For crying out loud, why would you change to a redirect and not merge if there's something worth keeping? Stop being obtuse. Cburnett 22:39, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- My point is that some people see a merge and redirect as copying the entire article in question and pasting it in another article, often very inelegantly. I would not want to see this done in this case. Most of the article should not be kept. -R. fiend 06:33, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Actually, yours is only the second vote for merge and redirect. Several others have said "redirect" but not "merge", while Mgm voted to merge "anything useful" (which is debatable, but certainly not the majority of the article could be called so). Most of the votes have been delete. -R. fiend 20:30, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Another vote to merge anything useful into the Kill Bill article. Certainly the image can be added to the KB article if it isn't already. 23skidoo 21:01, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Where do you think I got the picture? :) Cburnett 22:39, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Merge anything useful and redirect. -- Antaeus Feldspar 21:02, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, no encyclopedic content worth merging. Barno 21:15, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- But what's your problem with redirecting? Cburnett 22:39, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- To be specific: No encyclopedic content worth redirecting. Not a topic (neither the vehicle in a non-plot-advancing scene in a not-culturally-noteworthy movie, nor the general concept which existed decades before the movie) that a user would reasonably be searching for in WP. Barno 16:07, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- But what's your problem with redirecting? Cburnett 22:39, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not encyclopedic --Silas Snider (talk) 01:13, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, pussycruft. ComCat 01:40, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Merge → Kill Bill. —Markaci 2005-03-22 T 03:11 Z
- Merge / redirect to Kill Bill -- Lochaber 15:05, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to Kill Bill. I believe that the article should remain, but I'd rather have it as part of Kill Bill than have it wiped out of existance. David Silva 03:24, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
