Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pushups

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE AND REDIRECT.

[edit] Pushups

This first-person-voiced article simply is not encyclopedic. We already have an article called Press up, with a redirect from Push up. "Pushups" is original research, and doesn't even really have much to bother merging into Press up. func(talk) 30 June 2005 17:32 (UTC)

• Isn't that a copyvio from [1]? Anyway, if it's not: redirect to press up because this is original research. Sietse 30 June 2005 18:18 (UTC)
• Delete and redirect. -Sean Curtin June 30, 2005 18:33 (UTC)
• Merge and Redirect, assuming this isn't copyvio - If it is a copyvio then Speedy Delete. - There is some added value to this expanded description of Press Ups/Push Ups. The single-word "Pushups" redirect is probably valuable too. Daedalus-Prime 30 June 2005 19:34 (UTC)
  • On the talk page, an anon, (presumably User:Weaselic125) states: "I have obtained written permission from the author of the source to use this content before actually writing the wiki entry. Though I must admit, I only gave reference to the author in the summary of the pictures. I also neglected to fully understand the GNU license, and will taylor the entry if given the chance to do so." func(talk) 30 June 2005 20:03 (UTC)
• Delete POV original research. JamesBurns 1 July 2005 03:45 (UTC)
• Delete and redirect to press up. --Angr/_{tɔk tə mi} 1 July 2005 05:49 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.