Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purgatize

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by Agathoclea. MER-C 12:13, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Purgatize

Purgatize (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested prod. Article is about a non-notable neologism. superapathyman 05:58, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. WP:WINAD, neologism and a total of 3 ghits. skip (t / c) 06:03, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and salt. Neologism. Even if it were a real word, Wikipedia isn't a dictionary. Creator now seems to be using this article as an editorial platform to criticize Wikipedia. =Axlq 06:04, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete CSD G10, it's apparent that it's some kid who is using this to attack someone. Ina ny case, not only is this a neologism but even IF it was legitimate, it belongs in wikitionary anyway. Hobbeslover ^{talk/contribs} 06:14, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - WP:NFT gallore. We need to make up a new CSD category for obvious NFT neologisms. Part Deux 07:43, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete - attack page. MER-C 10:52, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.