Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puppy breath (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:04, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Puppy breath

Puppy breath (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

procedural nomination Article proposed for deletion despite a previous trip to Articles for Discussion. PROD nominator states: "original research, unsourced, nn". Previous discussion ended with no consensus. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 12:37, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - No sources, original research, not notable, per nom. Avruch^Talk 13:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - it either fails WP:DICT or WP:OR. Either way, it should be nuked. --BlindEagle^{talk~contribs} 16:55, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete If this is notable among dog breeders as something other than a chat-room topic, it will get sourced. If not, goodbye. SchmuckyTheCat
• Delete. Just get rid of this already, my goodness. Burntsauce 23:13, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Bfigura ^(talk) 05:38, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, fails the everything test. RFerreira 19:29, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.