Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pulsatory Resonation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:07, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pulsatory Resonation

Pulsatory Resonation (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Pure original research. Also fails WP:RS, WP:V. Dethme0w 03:25, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. You usually don't see OR that's literally research -- that's a new one for me! Dylan 04:37, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I wouldn't exactly dignify this as research, but in any case, it is very close to total nonsense, and there is no indication whatsoever anyone has ever noticed this. DGG (talk) 04:51, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Nonsense. --ScottMorrison 06:21, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. I'm no expert, but it sounds like gibberish to me. Jermor 02:01, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.