Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pull cord

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete (counting nominator's vote). Robert ^{T | @ | C} 02:52, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Pull cord

This is a very bad article about a very real thing. Listing on AfD to give chance for expansion, formerly labeled as CSD. — Phil Welch 23:18, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

• Comment. This is speedy delete material at the moment under A1. One inward link from FLCL. However, it could be turned into a useful article. The cord that is part of a parachute is the ripcord. Capitalistroadster 00:05, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as not encylopedic. This is not a bolt or a motor, any instance of a "pull cord" should be kept with it's parent entry, as there does not exist an independant entity. - brenneman^(t)(c) 01:29, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep real thing. Millions of people use this sort of thing every day. Klonimus 05:50, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Anyone who knows what the words "pull" and "cord" mean know what a pull cord is. Merge any useful content into the articles about devices equipped with pull cords. flowersofnight (talk) 06:23, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.