Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public domain (internet)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. —Cryptic 06:40, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Public domain (internet)

Public domain (internet) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

too short to be a article Tooshorty 02:06, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete (although "too short" is not really a deletion argument) since almost all uses of "public domain" at IANA's website are the usual understood intellectual property meaning.[1] -- and there are no occurences of "private domain" at all. This is simply a misunderstanding of some kind. --Dhartung | Talk 02:44, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Agreed that there is some sort of fundamental misunderstanding here. The author appears to take "public domain" to mean "place where you can post content", but then compares this to a Generic top-level domain. I don't think there's an article here. Wickethewok 03:15, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Dicdef of a term that isn't used this way. Zetawoof^(ζ) 03:40, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete- per above--SUIT⁴² 04:51, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy something so bad it must be a troll. (The author is so proud of it that he cites it on his RfA.) -- Hoary 05:10, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - per above, and I read the RfA. Insanephantom (my Editor Review) 05:17, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Very poor definition of public domain, lacking in sources. (aeropagitica) 06:18, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.