Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychosomantic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy redirect to psychosomatic. Stifle (talk) 21:15, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Psychosomantic

Psychosomantic (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Contested PROD. Original research essay about an unsourced neologism. There are Google hits, including references to a "Journal of Psychosomantic Research", but they are all misprints for "Psychosomatic", or else people on blogs saying things like "damn. my lame spelling of psychosomantic went through before I could catch it. but maybe i just invented a new word... " JohnCD (talk) 09:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete:This isn't even a word. I feel like a tourist (talk) 10:26, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete. Wikipedia is not for things made up in one day. KleenupKrew (talk) 10:48, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Redirect to psychosomatic as it is a plausible typo. --Itub (talk) 15:02, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Redirect to psychosomatic as a neologism but plausible misspelling. Olaf Davis | Talk 21:17, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment as nominator: I support a redirect. The number of times Google throws it up as a typo for "psychosomatic" shows it is a plausible mis-spelling. JohnCD (talk) 21:20, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Redirect to psychosomatic as a plausible misspelling. Searches don't confirm the word as a notable neologism. —  scetoaux (T|C) 21:46, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Redirect: As stated by others, this word only exists as a misspelling for a word that already has an article. This article is horrendous. I feel like a tourist (talk) 14:33, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Redirect per above. In fact, I think I'll do that now. Stifle (talk) 21:15, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.