Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychosocraticneurolation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:33, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Psychosocraticneurolation

In google there are only to references to this word - both references to the wikipedia-article, and the phenomena hasn't made it into the diagnostic manuals or anything like that (the kind of books I work with as a psychologist). It is questionable, if you would put the mentioned symptoms in a new category, because they are fitting into some other well documented (so called) disorders. But as we psychiatrists and psychologists love to give new names to old things, this is no real argument against the existence of this thing. The word as such sounds strage to me, but we also like strange words, therefore ...

Anyway, I am not (N O T) objecting to include articles on "disorders" that affect only a small group of people (who knows, it might become a fashionable diagnosis next year allready), but I thing, we need a source, like some psychiatric journal ... as long, as there is no source, I think, this article is violating wikipedias verification-policy Enfiladissa 08:18, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete...neologism. Doesn't seem to be a real word. «LordViD» 08:40, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Comment also no google hits for the location "Rockin, California" where it was first diagnosed. Jamie ^{(talk/contribs)} 08:46, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Word does not appear in pubmed, which should have just about any professionally published medical report. Hansnesse 08:50, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete No presence on the net, and I'm very suspicious of the description as given. Denni ☯ 03:11, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unverified. Stifle 13:43, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.