Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychophilosophy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete.  Denelson83  21:29, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Psychophilosophy

It's an original research. Already deleted from the Italian Wikipedia in August, 2005 for the same reason (see here). Marcok 00:27, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete -- NSLE _{(Communicate!)} ^<Contribs> 00:44, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Edwardian 07:15, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. This is user:Linux 2005's only contribution and is in line with the stated interests on the user page. - Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] :: AfD? 14:22, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Noted on the author's user page - his signature is "Lino", which coincides with the mention of "philospher Lino Missio", making this a vanity entry. A Google search reveals a few people (Kent, Kramer, Tan Man Ho) publishing as if this is an established field of study. In general concept, it seems that a number of legitimate academics in philosophy are also involved in psychology, marrying the two disciplies. However, this article doesn't convey that concept. It's the article, not the concept, that merits deletion. ERcheck 14:57, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. *Exeunt* Ganymead ^Dialogue? 15:25, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Preaky 03:49, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete --F. Cosoleto 10:34, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.