Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychoheresy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect/merge to Antipsychology. As this article is poorly written and clearly unencyclopedic I am not going to cut-and-paste merge this. The article history remains available behind the redirect, I will leave it to interested and knowledgable editors to perform the merge as they see fit. ɑʀкʏɑɴ 22:57, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Psychoheresy

Psychoheresy (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Advocacy for and against a neologism of marginal notability. There's not much factual or sourced info to merge. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 14:07, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Merge what's useful with Antipsychology, as a suggested alternative to deletion. More here than just a "neologism", but this article is heavy on POV. Mandsford 14:44, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge as per Mandsford. Unless source come up about this being a big movement and not just a new book and its new fans. Lundse 15:21, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge carefully - A lot of the article is not really written in an encyclopedic tone. Needs in-text citations, especially for the quotes; but it appears to be the subject of some study. So, merge with Antipsychology, which is described in this article as "another term synonymous with psychoheresy," but more general. That makes this a good canditate for merging if the content is cleaned up and the references are integrated properly. ◄Zahakiel► 15:59, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, don't merge. It's an essay that plugs a series of publications. If it's notable enough to be added to Antipsychology, it will get there anyway. -- Rob C. alias Alarob 02:16, 15 September 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.