Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychedelipunk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete . - Mailer Diablo 00:30, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Psychedelipunk

Like the others, this appears to be a neologism that nobody really uses. Delete. —Matthew Brown (T:C) 07:25, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete As with the others. --Ccranium 15:07, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Unencyclopedic. NN, UV. - EurekaLott 15:26, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Piecruft. rodii 21:01, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Wow you're so smart you came up with piecruft, wow that must have taken a long time to come up with, you must have asked your mom - it took so many years of inbreeding for a genius like rodii to come up with such a dumb insult. Funnily enough rodii if you check the history you'll notice I didn't author this article you pathetic tool! Piecraft 02:19, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - Cyberpunk and Steampunk are one thing, but you can't have a whole category of new literary "genres" by appending the suffix "-punk" to whatever strikes your fancy. Endomion 02:26, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete all this punkcruft. We should have listed all of these into a consolidated AfD. Jamie ^{(talk/contribs)} 03:04, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.