Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychedelic transhumanism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:08, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Psychedelic transhumanism

Should the article Psychedelic transhumanism be deleted due to its lack of notability? --Loremaster 19:28, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 10:55, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

• That rationale is not useful. What notability criteria are being applied? How does the subject fail to satisfy them? Please explain why you think that this article is unverifiable or original research. Uncle G 13:10, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete only 12 unique hits for "psychedelic transhumanism" [1] - not enough secondary sources to meet reliability and verification standards. --Trödel 14:10, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete term was coined too recently to be notable. Needs better sources. Danny Lilithborne 14:14, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, playing with words like other items on the VfD. Pavel Vozenilek 19:36, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

No one was playing with words. Although he may not be notable enough to merit a Wikipedia article, Paul Hughes is an interviewed advocate who identifies himself as a psychedelic transhumanist. --Loremaster 23:22, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.