Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PsyBNC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. —Cleared as filed. 15:29, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] PsyBNC

Poorly formatted, not much information Thorpe | talk 10:44, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. The author doesn't seem to understand template use. ;) Royboycrashfan 10:58, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Strong keep There are 300,000+ Google hits for psyBNC. It's eminently notable, well-known software. Yes, the article sucks and the author was evidently unclear on the concept, but that doesn't mean we delete it and hope someone else creates it later. If it weren't 4AM, I'd fix it myself now, but I'll put it on my list of stuff to desuckify. Adrian Lamo ·· 11:52, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep are you serious? —This user has left wikipedia 19:20 2006-02-05
• Speedy keep. Formatting, template use, and lack of information are not grounds for deletion. They are grounds for improving the article via consensus editing. Ikkyu2 21:38, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Speedy keep. one of the most used BNC applications. -Cyrock

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.