Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pspsmm
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. -Doc ask? 15:36, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Pspsmm
WP:WEB Will (E@) T 13:39, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as a NN website, please. -- Grafikm_fr (AutoGRAF) 13:58, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. ConDemTalk 14:09, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Bucketsofg✐ 15:33, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I count 38 unique Google hits Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:03, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Also, fancruft. --^demon 23:09, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Anon user - Please delete, cou;d be considered Vanity [[1]]. Website is too small to be considered a topic on Wikipedia
- Delete per WP:WEB --Deville (Talk) 03:21, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep the article follows all guidelines. --wilhel1812 (Talk) 12:24, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comments. 1) Please use normal methods of AfD, which is keep or delete. 2) If you say it meets all guidlines, please tell us how it meets WP:WEB. --^demon 10:26, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep I cant c what rule it brakes. and this article is small, and "listy" right now, but we're still making it, and it will get more useful soon. --wilhel1812 (Talk) 12:24, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, no Alexa ranking, few Google hits, fails to meet WP:WEB. -- ReyBrujo 15:27, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep The alexa ranking is on its way, and it has been for a month. --wilhel1812 (Talk) 19.00, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment you don't get to vote three times. Please vote only once. ergot 17:59, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment sorry, i'm still not 100% familuar whit wikipedia, but i'm learning. tnx
- Comment you don't get to vote three times. Please vote only once. ergot 17:59, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- And Delete. Fails WP:WEB. ergot 17:59, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment "The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself." the coding team has produced multiple games and applications. PSPFlash cards, smm leveleditor, froggergame + alot of smm mods, and some other games. Many other games in on its way.wilhel1812 15:00, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
- I don't think you understand that criteria. It means that the content of the site has been reported by some outside (reputable) media source, be it another web site, a magazine, etc. --^demon 13:26, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
- Maybe i dont, but the first link was from another site, and all our games has been mentioned @ other sites. wilhel1812 18:17, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment "The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself." the coding team has produced multiple games and applications. PSPFlash cards, smm leveleditor, froggergame + alot of smm mods, and some other games. Many other games in on its way.wilhel1812 15:00, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
