Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psp authority

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete -- Longhair 12:44, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Psp authority

Non-notable webzine. Has released two issues and apparently died after that (contested prod). Pak21 11:49, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Not notable enough, maybe in the future if it succeeds. Ydam 14:37, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable. --Ed (Edgar181) 14:51, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom; if the best they've done to date is 3-5K downloads, that fails WP:WEB or any other publication criteria. RGTraynor 15:14, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable. - LeonWhite 15:37, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Do Not Delete All the Above users are just saying that because Josh edgar asked them to do it, and they have no real opinion of their own on the matter. Josh is just being a bitter person because he isn't working on the magazine anymore. And as far as psp independment mags go, PSPA is technically the 2nd or 3rd most download mag per issue. Heck even major sites like PGR that produc(ed) a psp mag didnt even get 1000 downloads... - Psp Authority 12:10, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: the above edit was actually made by 198.69.68.2 (talk · contribs). And I had to go and read the article again to work out who Josh Edgar was... --Pak21 16:22, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Based on a nasty message left on my talk page by the same anon that posted above as "Psp Authority", I have been confused with the Josh Edgar he mentions. For the record, I am not that person, and have never had any kind of connection to this webzine. --Ed (Edgar181) 16:30, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment For the record nobody asked me to vote on this matter and I certainly do not know this Josh Edgar person Ydam 16:40, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - Surprising as this may sound, it is possible for editors to judge the (non-)notability of an article on its own merits; assume good faith. This website fails, and if a so-called "major" PSP site can't score as many as 1000 downloads for its in-house mag, I submit that such a site isn't particularly "major" at all. RGTraynor 16:50, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this mag is non-notable. I might add that I've never heard of Josh Edgar. -Geoffspear 16:20, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Four months old, two issues, a few thousand downloads, fails notability by a wide margin. Fan1967 18:39, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I say delete as well. As I said before someone reverted it back, haivng a wikipedia page is pointless anyways, the demographic trying to be reached will not find pspa through this anwyays. Also for the record, pspa just released issues 3/4 like seconds ago. And that 3-5k downloads is an average per issue. The biggest sites downloads came from pspupdates.com and pspmagazines.com both of which have amassed over a thousand each for the past issues. And BTW Josh Edgar is a former team member on the PSPA staff who left the project abruptly, because of dispute between which forum to use. Your name being edgar, and his name being edgar, I had assumed it was him since he has been a really poor sport about it. PSP Authority 18:39, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. ~ Hibana 03:32, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete not notable. --Starionwolf 06:53, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.