Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pseudorealism in Indian Art

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete - and Ray isn't notable either. DS 21:44, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pseudorealism in Indian Art

[Nomination; ed. DB] delete - see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devajyoti Ray 4.18GB 23:42, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

• Weak Delete - Devajyoti Ray is notable but this is probably cruft.Bakaman _Bakatalk 15:08, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Devajyoti Ray might be notable enough to deserve an article, but this is not. Merge any salvagable content to Devajyoti Ray. utcursch | talk 08:54, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. See Devajyoti Ray AfD discussion for details. Pavel Vozenilek 03:49, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. Bakaman _Bakatalk 01:58, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete No sources whatsoever, no evidence of WP:Notability. The article mentions the work of only a single individual . Agree there's no reason not to simply fold the discussion into the Devajyoti Ray article. --Shirahadasha 03:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

• Strong Delete as per Utcursch - move anything not fancruft to Devajyoti Ray. Elomis 21:34, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.