Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protexx

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 18:07, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Protexx

Delete. Commercial spam and not notable:Wikipedia:Notability (companies and corporations) As far as my quick googling could tell, only relevant google hit was on its own website, and the article constitutes little more than an advertisement.Jens Nielsen 15:39, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Non-notable company. -- cmh 05:14, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Freddie 02:05, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

• Incomplete nomination listed now. - Liberatore(T) 13:39, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. (Liberatore, 2006) 12:34, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per above. JPD (talk) 12:58, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Viridae 13:05, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete advert of nn company Optimale ^Gu 14:28, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, wikispamvertising. NawlinWiki 15:34, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete as obvious adcruft, created by Securedata (talk · contribs), a Wikipedia:Single purpose account.---CH 00:51, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.