Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prostitution in Mexico

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW. Like the featured article Prostitution in the People's Republic of China this sort of article is clearly encyclopediac - Peripitus (Talk) 12:10, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Prostitution in Mexico

Prostitution in Mexico (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Totally unencyclopedic, plus possible libel issues. —Animum (etc.) 00:57, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

I have used credible sources materials on the issues surrounding prostitution in mexicoDwanyewest 01:01, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep The topic is encyclopedic and the article is referenced. The article could be improved but that's an argument for improving it not deleting it. --Richard 01:12, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. It has only just been created. I would give it a chance to develop. Kulokk 01:13, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, obviously a valid topic for discussion. hateless 01:14, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, encyclopedic stub vs. a "how-to", and libel doesn't apply to a country. --Dhartung | Talk 05:51, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Uncertain where the "libel" issues pop up here. Certainly an issue which has the attention of Mexican politicians, and hence the media. Article is a lot shorter than it ought to be, but is better than nothing (and provides links so that a reader can find out more). Sjakkalle (Check!) 05:58, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, per much precedence: Category:Prostitution by country. Let it grow and develop before judging. --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 10:08, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, per Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr). The article is an encyclopedic topic that needs expansion. --Lenticel (talk) 11:57, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.