Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prooftext

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Ifnord 20:24, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Prooftext

Looks like an unsourced original research/neologism/pov fork. Uncategorized, and with nothing meaningful linking to it. Delete. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 20:15, Feb. 2, 2006

• Keep, a Google search pulls up 27,000+ hits, which all appear to use it as the article explains. Apparently a real, if new, feature of evangelical Christian apologetics.--ThreeAnswers 20:19, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I've been a Christian 20+ years, and its been happening as long as I remember Jcuk 20:27, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Clean and Keep Prooftexting seems legit, but the article needs some citations. --Bugturd Talk 20:41, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and clean up. It could use several more examples and needs to be more balanced in order to preserve NPOV. Logophile 11:16, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.