Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pronotum

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No consensus to keep or merge -> Keep. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 19:00, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Pronotum

Delete. Dictionary entry. Move to Wiktionary and cover the subect in the article insect. DanMS 01:27, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

• Merge and Redirect to insect. --best, kevin ···Kzollman | Talk··· 01:37, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep -- this is clearly an item that should be discussed somewhere on Wikipedia. --Mysidia (talk) 05:11, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

Yes, it should be discussed somewhere—within the article on insects. ♠ DanMS 06:32, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

• Transwiki. I've never heard this word before, but that does not make it a neologism.  Denelson83  05:12, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect with insect until it's expanded. Feel free to transwiki a copy to wiktionary as well. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:18, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, likely search term, should not be merged with insect. Kappa 16:24, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect with insect. ♥purplefeltangel ^(talk) ♥ ^(contribs) 17:45, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect. This won't prevent its use as a search term. Superm401 | Talk 22:41, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep ··gracefool |☺ 17:47, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• keep pelase this is more than just a dictionary def Yuckfoo 05:32, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.