Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProjectsCenter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 23:31, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ProjectsCenter

• del no evidence of notability of neither company nor software. `'mikka (t) 17:42, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

• This is a new company that was just founded. It is a California Corporation and you can inquire about it with the secretary of state. It is already being used by SWB Consulting (www.swb-consulting.com) and Raven IT (www.ravenit.com) and multiple other companies all over the states are doing the free trial. There is a discussion forum at http://projectscenter.com/projectmanagementsoftware/project-management-forum/ where you can post any questions you might have about the software. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nima1981 (talk • contribs) 18:02, 13 October 2006
• It is also listed in the reputed directory www.web-based-software.com: http://www.project-management-software.org/project/index9.asp —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nima1981 (talk • contribs) 18:05, 13 October 2006
  • Note that Nima1981 (talk · contribs) is the original author of the article. Vectro 18:38, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete; if it was just founded then it is almost certainly not notable. Mere existence does not confer notability. Vectro 18:38, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Vectro. If the company "was just founded", it has basically no chance of having achieved any sort of notability. Zetawoof^(ζ) 19:33, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
• But the website existed long before the founders actually incorporated officially. What exactly is your objection to posting information about this tool along with other tools that are available on the internet? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nima1981 (talk • contribs)
• Delete. Nima, Wikipedia only lists companies and products that have a degree of notability. The article about this recently-created company asserts no notability about the company. Unless you can demonstrate that this company meets the notability requirements listed in WP:CORP, the company currently doesn't warrant a Wikipedia article. NeoChaosX [talk | contribs] 01:54, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
• The following criterion is met: "The company or corporation is listed on ranking indices of important companies produced by well-known and independent publications.3", namely: http://www.project-management-software.org/project/index9.asp. Also the company SWB Consulting endorses the tool on their website: www.swb-consulting.com
  • Comment This project-management-software.org, which I've never seen or heard of before, is just a directory of business software makers. I'd hardly say it's a "well-known, independent publication". NeoChaosX [talk | contribs] 05:13, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete not notable, also note that "Nima" is the admin name on the company's forum site linked above. —WAvegetarian•(talk) 02:21, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

• Please elaborate as to why you assert that http://www.project-management-software.org is not a "well-known, independent publication"?
  • This is a mere list, with no assertion of quality nor ranking of the tool signed by a known, reputable expert. `'mikkanarxi 05:28, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

• See www.swb-consulting.com for assertion of quality.
• Also the site is ranked high on msn.com for highly relevant keywords, such as "project management tool", "online project management tool", "web based project management tool", "online collaboration tool", "project management scheduling tool"

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.