Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progress Quest

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. -Splash 01:07, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Progress Quest

Looks like a mix of vanity, advertising, and crystal ball. JustinWells 08:26, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

I don't understand how anybody can spend that much time on an MMORPG. XD 08:38, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. Seems to be fairly well known. ManoaChild 08:52, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - well-known parody. XD: This isn't an actual MMORPG - the article makes clear that it's just a program which, once started, plays by itself - an RPG equivalent of those spoof web-counter pages from a few years back. AlexTiefling 10:09, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. This is a popular parody of MMOs. --BradBeattie 12:26, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Keep - significant parody, both the game itself and the "culture" that surrounds it.--Mitsukai 14:08, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Keep - very well known parody toy. Nandesuka 15:04, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - Most efficient MMORPG I've ever played. - Lifefeed 18:33, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - It was quite popular around 2003. It even has it's own gamefaqs entry, which is not given to just any game. -GregNorc (talk) 19:05, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Well-known parody MMORPG. --Carnildo 23:45, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep It is fairly weilol-known. And It is neither advertising nor crystal ball. SYSS Mouse 01:38, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Well known. --Share Bear 13:26, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable parody. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 17:15, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep the progress, or your save might become corrupted. --zippedmartin 08:57, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Not advertising. The game is free! And as everyone else has pointed out it is a well known and significant parody. --oooEooo 17:51, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.