Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professional caregiver insurance risk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete - uncontested. Yomangani^talk 12:41, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Professional caregiver insurance risk

Delete for several reasons:

• The article appears to be a vanity piece:
  • The article is entirely the work of Drtcbear, who contributed the full article text in a single edit, signed "Thomas Cox PhD, RN", and with one exception two days later has not contributed to Wikipedia again.
  • The reference list is entirely the work of 24.250.251.228 in a single edit, and are all from the work of "Cox, T.", alone or in combination with others.
  • Except for wikifying links, there has been no contribution to the article by any other editor.
• The article is full of weasel-worded statements and opinion statements.
• The article reads like text from a professional magazine or a conference presentation, although I have not been able to locate it in any publicly available online sources.
• The article is an orphan - there are only four links, none from other articles.

RossPatterson 17:19, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. OR, as only one source is cited, apparently the article author himself, and major POV issues. Also reads like an insurance lecture. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 19:18, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.