Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Problem users

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. -- AllyUnion (talk) 09:59, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia talk:Problem users

• Delete. Archive. OK, fine, archive it, but ALSO archive all the subpages which still exist... (it's easy to find them, just enter "Problem users" into the search bar). --Dante Alighieri | Talk 01:41, Feb 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Comment - shouldn't Wikipedia discussions be preserved in some form of archive. Problem Users now redirects to Wikipedia:Requests for comment--ZayZayEM 02:48, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• I thought VfD does not have powers over the WP space. JuntungWu 04:05, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep for archival purposes. That said, there ought to be pointers from each of these defunct pages to the relevant current WP page (in this case, Wikipedia:Requests for comment). IMHO VfD should have power over WP namespace pages (and I believe that it has led to a few getting deleted), but such pages ought be deleted rarely, if ever. -Sean Curtin 04:45, Feb 12, 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. Archive, if nothing else. Eric119 06:37, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep but consider moving under Wikipedia:Archive. jni 14:00, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and archive. No doubt these pages will somehow be needed in later discussion somewhere. Mgm|^(talk) 14:21, Feb 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep record, possibly move to archive. Gazpacho 23:52, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and archive. Denni☯ 00:17, 2005 Feb 13 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.