Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro rata

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Woohookitty 9 July 2005 08:25 (UTC)

[edit] Pro rata

Dicdef. We already have it in Wiktionary. - Sietse 30 June 2005 15:35 (UTC)

• Then, speedy? Penwhale 30 June 2005 15:44 (UTC)
  • No, because it is not a copy from Wiktionary. Sietse 30 June 2005 17:19 (UTC)
    • I've lost count of people who mistake Wikipedia for a dictionary. In Finnish, the words for "encyclopedia" and "dictionary" are nearly identical, but Finland is not the whole world, so I can't explain why so many people make that mistake. — JIP | Talk 30 June 2005 18:36 (UTC)
• Delete - I agree that this is a Dicdef as written. However, I could see a case for an expanded discussion of e.g. Pro Rata Voting, in which case I would say Cleanup Daedalus-Prime 30 June 2005 19:07 (UTC)
• Soft redirect to Wiktionary. This is linked form a few places, so we should point people in the right direction. — Gwalla | Talk 1 July 2005 00:21 (UTC)
• Delete dicdef already in wiktionary. JamesBurns 1 July 2005 03:37 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.