Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prizm Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Majorly (hot!) 16:29, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Prizm Project

Prizm Project (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable charity, somewhat betrayed by their extremely weak google presence. Third party sources are trivial. Contested prod. MER-C 11:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Keep Doesn't exactly fail anything. I'm going to have to say cleanup, however. I'm going to have to ask, however, that other users disregard the google presence, as WP:GHITS is a violation of concensus and doesn't prove anything. Cool Blue^{Light my Fire!} 12:17, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

• It's not a proof of non-notablity, it is an indicator. For a notable organisation, I'd be expecting more. MER-C 12:50, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

• It's still a violation of WP:GHITS, and the number of hits doesn't mean anything, as the issue has to be resolved without ghits. Cool Blue^{Light my Fire!} 13:08, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

• Keep, having well-attended retreats across two continents, as well as partnerships and ongoing charity work makes this organisation notable enough to my mind. Lankiveil 13:02, 15 April 2007 (UTC).
• Keep, I suspect that many of the sources that would exist if this were a charity in the West do not exist because of the nature of the places where this organisation does most of its work. In this case, the lack of a Google presence does not indicate non-notability. MichelleG 13:06, 15 April 2007 (UTC).
• Delete. Very thin sourcing. If they are notable, one would expect published 3rd party commentary on the impact of their work. Holding meetings, having partnerships and being charitable do not establish notability. EdJohnston 15:37, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Work in Africa probably explains Google hits. It's work across several countries establishes enough notability to keep. Davewild 18:02, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.