Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priscilla Yeung

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Tyrenius 01:19, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Priscilla Yeung

Priscilla Yeung (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable biography - does not meet the requirements for WP:Notability. No major award or press coverage - article fails to assert notability. Ozgod 04:07, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete There are 600 Google hits for all the different people named "Priscilla Yeung" combined. There really aren't enough sources to write a good article about her - that's one of the reasons we use the notability principle. YechielMan 04:24, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
• Comment Subject does not look notable from what I can see, but I don't know everything (and neither does the Google) -- we should just tag the article with notability for now, and give the author a chance to establish it. Capmango 14:37, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. No GNews archive hits.[1] The Wikipedia article is the sole hit anywhere for the Chinese name [2]. Google Books search gets two art gallery brochures (!?!??!) from Or Gallery and Grunt Gallery. [3] Also suspect WP:COI. cab 08:18, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
• Comment I think that any time that WP:N is the only reason an article is being sent to afd, and the article appears to be written in good faith by someone who is just not clear that notability needs to be asserted, we should start with a notability tag, not go straight to afd. Capmango 14:41, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Although I'm inclined to agree with Capmango for the most part, I don't think there's much that could be added to this article to establish notability: she's had two shows of minimal note and that's it. I think tagging it as non-notable would merely result in it sitting there untouched for months. Freshacconci 17:32, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 17:16, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 17:17, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable "artist". BH (T|C) 02:12, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Comment I just wanted to note that I have no doubt that Ms. Yeung is a legitimate artist. She's just not notable yet. Freshacconci 02:24, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.