Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Printcasting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:09, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Printcasting

Yet another protologism from the podosphere. --Haakon 20:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia itself uses the term. [[1]]. --Nashville

Sorry, that's Wikinews. --Nashville

Keep this. Page, I love it!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.10.169.10 (talk • contribs)

Note The only non-vandalism post from this IP. Fan-1967 18:44, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 17:10, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Keep. If our sister project Wikinews uses it, we should have it as an article. Wikipedia is a puzzle piece. Plain and simple. TrackerTV (CW|Castform|Green Valley) 05:07, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom.--Chaser T 21:59, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• delete seems to me delete per WP:NEO or WP:OR. As much as I find the word cute, I think the reference article in german is not relevant in this context. The german language is full of words which are composed of smaller words all banged together. The use of "printcasting" in English does not seem that popluarised yet, unlike podcasting. Ohconfucius 05:37, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 23:35, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as neologism. About 12 Google hits, but none are valid secondary sources. eaolson 16:00, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as neologism -- Whpq 20:59, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.