Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Principles of military strategy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was merge and redirect to military strategy. Babajobu 02:37, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Principles of military strategy
Either this is original research or an instruction manual, though it has a long history. If it is neither, vote KEEP. If it is, what do we do with it?-- Perfecto 00:32, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Redirect to The Art of War. Arbustoo 00:49, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Main article for section of Military strategy. References were poorly formatted. Have reformatted them - adds clarity to sources (notable, historical military documents). —ERcheck @ 00:58, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect Redirect to Military strategy Avi 01:24, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- It is a "main article" from the Military strategy#Principles of military strategy section. —ERcheck @ 01:26, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- Merge back into military strategy; there isn't enought material to justify an article split here. —Kirill Lokshin 01:50, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- Merge back into military strategy per above. Royal Blue 02:15, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Blnguyen 02:37, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- Merge per Lok. Siva1979Talk to me 11:41, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
- Merge Phr 13:47, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep I think there is ample scope to have a separate article devoted to the principles of military strategy. As it stands, this article isn't it, but that is no reason to delete it. Geoff/Gsl 20:47, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect to Military strategy. This article is all crap, btw, so I sympathize with the deletionists, but its a possible search term so a redirect is more fitting. savidan(talk) (e@) 18:59, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.