Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princeton Report on Knowledge

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:08, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Princeton Report on Knowledge

Princeton Report on Knowledge (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Non-notable student publication as it hasn't been subject to multiple independent reports. Google hasn't heard of them. Contested prod. MER-C 03:31, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete The only thing that would make this publication notable is if they won an award or were the subject of some press. Per nom... Diez2 03:34, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Non-notable. —ShadowHalo 06:13, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Now my maths is a little rusty, but if "there are approximately 3 issues per year" and this is "volume 2 number 1" [1] then that gives us grand total of ... four issues...ever. The entire article is just spammy sales-pitching and OR, with no meaningful assertion of notability. Google produces only 40 distinct hits [2], with this article already in at number 2. -- IslaySolomon | talk 07:07, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
  • DeleteHow come it wasn't deleted for so long? Not notable. --Meno25 07:27, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep and trim flowery words. Notable due to being a source of high profile interviews. John Vandenberg 08:55, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete The one reference cited in the article is the only one I could find on LexisNexis and NewsBank. It may be notable in time, but there's not enough published material about it yet. -SpuriousQ 09:14, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete insufficiently sourced to establish notablity.-- danntm T C 21:24, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.