Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Tatiana of Leiningen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect. Maxim_(talk) 14:23, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Princess Tatiana of Leiningen

Princess Tatiana of Leiningen (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

The article fails to cite sources, the subject fails WP:BIO. No proof she's an actual royal, and even if she is, she's still not notable. Delete GreenJoe 14:40, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Redirect to House of Leiningen. Someone should check the articles of her sisters as well.--Sethacus 16:05, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

They've now been tagged for speedy deletion. GreenJoe 16:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

One of them was already declined as it was tagged with the wrong db tag. I'm removed the rest, they're not speedy candidate as there is an assertion of notability, even if one think they're not notable enough. KTC 19:04, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete/Redirect The nobility = notable argument has between used before, but this person is so incredibly minor that her only important place on Wikipedia is in the article Line of succession to the British throne and possibly in an article on the House of Leiningen. If the only thing making someone notable is their ancestry, put them in the articles that make them notable, not one of their own. Charles 18:09, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
• Merge/redirect to House of Leiningen, which has plenty of room for a listing of important members. Note that the word Princess is used to translate the German Fürstin, a title of nobility ranking below a Duke. --Dhartung | Talk 18:58, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

• Comment I think you are confusing the German title Fürstin with Tatiana's would-be title of Prinzessin, which has no bearing here anyway. Charles 21:56, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete: There are 650 or so people in line to the British throne, all but one of whom are bound to be disappointed (probably including Prince Charles). They don't all deserve their own articles. Much better to be divided by House or however the European royals are divided than have hundreds of worthless articles. Watchingthevitalsigns 02:27, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete/Redirect to her father's article. The only non-boilerplate content in the article is one sentence about her schooling, which could just as well live there. Choess 01:06, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.