Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Of The Land (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 03:11, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Princess Of The Land (film)

Princess Of The Land (film) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Disputed prod. Prod claims this doesn't meet WP:MOVIE and WP:CRYSTAL, and I highly agree. Creator's only contributions are this and some changes to a template to include it, plus some reverts. UsaSatsui (talk) 16:55, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

• Comment - Is there any source for the existence of this project. Animation is quite long to produce, longer than a classical film, 4 years or more, so it could already be in production. But a source is needed. Hektor (talk) 20:47, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
  • If one turns up, I'll gladly withdraw, but I haven't been able to find one.--UsaSatsui (talk) 21:05, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
    • Then Delete except if the creator of the article can provide a source. And if possible more than one. Hektor (talk) 19:40, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. No citations, no sources. WP:NOT a fan site, etc. SpikeJones (talk) 05:13, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - unable to turn up any sources with a search for the film title and pixar. IMDB has no entry for it. Completely fails verifiability. -- Whpq (talk) 04:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, for the reasons made by the nominator, and also WP:V.--Aldux (talk) 15:23, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.