Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Sigismund of Prussia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. – NSR (talk) 06:21, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Prince Sigismund of Prussia

Unencyclopedic. Died as baby. Did nothing prominent, represented nothing prominent. All details can be put into his mother's article. 217.140.193.123 09:00, 17 August 2005 (UTC) Just the fact that he was born a royal, does not suffice. I have earlier stated some thumb-rule criteria of royal babies having an own article, such as if the baby in question left a country in a succession crisis when dying. Or possibly, if the history may have altered significantly, had the baby lived. Otherwise, all the pertinent details of the baby in question fit into articles of parent(s), and an own article is undeserved. For encyclopedia, it is fragmenting to make these separate articles. 217.140.193.123 09:02, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

• Keep inherently interesting, if there is nothing to say, then redirect to parents. No need to delete. Trollderella 19:50, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep the child may not have lived long but the fact he lived at all is of historial relevance.
• Redirect to parent's page. Not good to disperse infopieces to this sort of small articles. Arrigo 20:59, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Nobility does not imply notability. Martg76 23:58, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Not good to squash info into articles where it doesn't naturally belong. Osomec 00:13, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable child. Capitalistroadster 01:39, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep for reasons stated under the Grand Duke baby nomination, below. 23skidoo 03:16, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep all real royalty. Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:59, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - otherwise I would agree, but stating that particular person of royal blood is definitely dead will deter false pretenders - Skysmith 12:06, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - May only be a minor child but is still of interest to those interested in British and German royalty. Chrispo 20:52, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - A grandchild of Queen Victoria, this article merits keeping in relation to his parents.
• Week Keep - With both parents notable there is no other natural place for the article's information. Caerwine 22:13, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. john k 16:28, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.