Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Primitive cultures

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Tony Sidaway^Talk 14:48, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Primitive cultures

Delete, subject is inherently POV. Use of TinTin as a source suggests article not created in best of faith. FreplySpang (talk) 06:05, August 20, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, racist babble, probably intentionally provocative. Everyking 06:09, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Irreparably POV title. --MarkSweep 06:17, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, racist nonsense, and I rather doubt China has a lower level of literacy than the West. Zoe 06:18, August 20, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - I can't accept the authority of TinTin -- Solipsist 06:19, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
• delete (just BS) --Irpen
• DELETE-There shouldn't even be a discussion, it borders on Vandilism --dirtyliberal 06:22, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, babble, somehow I don't think this is NPOV. [[User:Premeditated Chaos|User:Premeditated Chaos/Sig]] 06:55, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, or to put it another way, fuzzy original research with dodgy terminology and no anthropological support. Wyss 07:03, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
• DELETE- racist bunk. a relatively backward civilization compared to the West. come on now. Christy747 07:07, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to primitive culture. Christopher Parham (talk) 07:33, 2005 August 20 (UTC)
• Redirect as per Christopher Parham. Capitalistroadster 08:29, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete POV racist Manik Raina 19:07, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
• Merge salvagable information with Primitive culture, and keep as redirect. 80.255 20:06, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
  • to anyone arguing for a redirect. It would be good to have this as a redirect to Primitive culture, but this new redirect entry would have nothing to do with this bunch of BS. There is nothing salvagable here to merge there, and keeping this original research (to put in mildly) in history, would only provide a battlefield for restoring this text from a redirect by a racist POV pushers. We first should delete it, then create a redirect. Please think it over. --Irpen 23:15, August 20, 2005 (UTC)
• When I voted to redirect, I voted to delete the content of this article and create a redirect to primitive culture. If I thought there was any content in the article worthy of preservation, I would have voted merge. Capitalistroadster 23:49, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Who was the racist who wrote ths?--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 07:53, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete. --Agamemnon2 11:18, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unscientific and POV trash. The warped mind who created this article is the real "primitive". —Seselwa 22:54, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect all nonsense with reasonably valid titles. - Zanaq

• Nominate for "Best of Wikipedia". If "Primitive cultures" isn't a legitimate subject, then how can somebody have MAJORED in it in Animal House? Logic, people!

• DELETE- Sick Humour.--Ambar 14:03, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.