Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prima Donna (American Band)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Eluchil404 21:56, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Prima Donna (American Band)

Prima Donna (American Band) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Former speedy deletion candidate, I removed the corresponding tag as I felt the article had some factual notability. In any case, I'd rather to let you discuss about the article notability. I am neutral about the issue. Angelo 00:00, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable (WP:MUSIC). They also reference several secondary sources, though I find it hard to say if those are reliable or not. — Ksero 00:36, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep The band also went on an out of country tour (WP:MUSIC).Ajaxcornelius 01:27, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • No opinion on this, but IF this article is kept: 1)It needs to be moved to Prima Donna (American band) and 2)The article currently at Prima Donna (band) would need to be moved to something like Prima Donna (UK band) (and have Prima Donna (band) be a disambiguation article). TJ Spyke 04:13, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
    • I have created Prima Donna (disambiguation). I can see a case for moving Prima Donna (band) to Prima Donna (UK band) and redirecting the first to the DAB page, but, frankly, I don't think it is worth it. The Eurovision entry is probably more notable, and so deserves the 'top spot', as it were. I also moved the page we are discussing to the correct title. J Milburn 11:28, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. -RiverHockey 14:06, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • I am the nom, but if you thoroughly read my words you can understand I am quite neutral about the issue. Can you please explain why you actually feel this article should be deleted? --Angelo 14:21, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Plenty of secondary sources proving this is legit.Ajaxcornelius 17:40, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.