Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PrezInfo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. No assertion of notability, not to mention pretty spammy. faithless (speak) 08:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] PrezInfo

PrezInfo (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

This seems to be a non-notable website. Most of the sections of the site are 'under construction' and the author of the article seems to have a conflict of interest. They uploaded this image:[1], stating that they are the copyright holder and release it to the public domain. Since it is the website's logo, it is likely that this person is also the author of the site. Mars2035 (talk) 02:15, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete I can't find any information on it. Looks promotional. Website looks like someone trying to make a few bucks. Beach drifter (talk) 02:35, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete If you want to be notable, it helps to have some information on your site that others can link to. Perhaps this one will one day. non notable , no info website. AlbinoFerret (talk) 02:41, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete It is a non-notable website. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 03:06, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete It looks like someone created a website, then immediately made a wikipedia page for it. I expect the site is as new as the article; definitely not (yet) notable. JeremyMcCracken (talk) 03:57, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete Article only asserts that it exists and how it uses it's ad revenue. Nothing about notability. Utterly fails WP:WEB. DarkAudit (talk) 04:54, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete - Article is basically adveritising for a site that earns money because of traffic.--Cahk (talk) 06:02, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete with haste. Advertising. No assertion of significance. --- Taroaldo (talk) 06:52, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.