Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prestonsburg High School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Phgao 10:57, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Prestonsburg High School

Prestonsburg High School (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

non notable school Phgao 05:57, 14 October 2007 (UTC) Closed as Keep Phgao 10:51, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete after merging content into List of high schools in Kentucky. --Nehwyn 06:02, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, I found that the school has a number of claims to notability, have updated the page just now. SolidPlaid 06:38, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Per nom. Fails WP:N Wisdom89 06:39, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Um, did you look at my changes? SolidPlaid 06:41, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep, WP:AFDP. Solid enough article; no point in deleting. — xDanielx T/C 06:53, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. —Chris 08:31, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep The article provides ample reliable and verifiable sources to satisfy the Wikipedia:Notability standard. Thanks to SolidPlaid for his efforts to expand to the article. The creation of an AfD for an article of this type 22 minutes after creation is abusive, plain and simple, and the apparent failure of the nominator to observe Wikipedia:deletion policy, which requires efforts to edit and improve the article before a headlong rush to AfD, is a violation of official Wikipedia policy that should not be tolerated. Alansohn 08:47, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong keep I added an infobox, and with information including a logo added to what's already there it can be a good article. Already pretty good. Definitely meets WP:N Carter | Talk to me 09:40, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - Article needs some further work, but now contains a reasonable amount of sources to be an encyclopedic entry to meet WP:N, deletion is not necessary. Camaron1 | Chris 09:59, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.