Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preston Ivan Lewis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. —Larry V (talk | contribs) 05:43, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Preston Ivan Lewis

Preston Ivan Lewis (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Fails biography notability (specifically academics), is probably autiobiographical and advertising. Previous prod. -- Jeandré, 2006-12-09t20:58z,

Comment Given that the deletion process has started to garner a bit of media attention [1], it would be nice to have reasons for deletion that aren't stuffed with jargon and acronyms. Catchpole 22:14, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

What does the existence of what amounts to a filler article have to do with the use of acronyms, especially if those acronyms are linked to the policy? Otto4711 23:15, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Nomination made reader friendlier as per WP:WOTTA, using SkierRMH's vote, especially since it's autiobiographical. -- Jeandré, 2006-12-10t12:59z

• Delete as per nom, spelled out, it's a biography piece, probably autiobiographical, could be considered as spam/advertising. And, the submitter missed WP:PROF. Nuf? SkierRMH,08:15, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and SkierRMH. Agent 86 00:42, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.