Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Press card

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE.

[edit] Press card

Stub entry, suggested by myself to transwiki to wikitionary; has been done. I think we can delete this article now. Penwhale 30 June 2005 12:00 (UTC)

• Keep, valid enough stub. Smerdis of Tlön June 30, 2005 14:22 (UTC)
• If it's been transwikied already, should be speedy delete. Proto t c 30 June 2005 15:23 (UTC)
• Keep, describes a real thing, not just a word. mikka (t) 30 June 2005 21:27 (UTC)
• Delete dicdef already in wiktionary. JamesBurns 1 July 2005 03:29 (UTC)
• Delete being a real thing is not the issue, it's the chance that this could be an encylopedic article. This sounds like a heading in a press article. Saying media are covered, covers who this is for, no need to list they classes of workers. This information would probably read better in the press article when you read it in context of how it is used. Vegaswikian 1 July 2005 05:23 (UTC)
• Delete, redirect to journalist. Radiant_>|< July 1, 2005 08:25 (UTC)
• Keep. NSR 1 July 2005 12:19 (UTC)
• Delete unless expanded beyong a dicdef. -R. fiend 1 July 2005 14:51 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.